• Next message: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Previous message: Dan Oister: "Re: Arch doc (finally)!"
• In reply to: Dan Oister: "Re: Arch doc (finally)!"
• Next in thread: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: June Mullins: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: June Mullins: "Re: meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Just confirming the meeting is tomorrow at 1:30.
  Right?

  don

--- Dan Oister <dano, gtme dot cc> wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Have a good week.
> 
> I'll be in touch.
> 
> Dan O
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Perry and Lorae Merritt 
>   To: antera, cryptofreak dot org 
>   Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:55 AM
>   Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)!
> 
> 
>   Apparently so.
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: June Mullins 
>     To: antera, cryptofreak dot org 
>     Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:42 AM
>     Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)!
> 
> 
>     Tuesday's meeting is at 1:30.  Does "I'll
> attach" mean you hadn't done it yet,
>     because it's not attached to this one?
> 
>                     June
> 
>     Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote:
> 
>       So June, since no one else reads this mail
> list should we just start communicating directly?
> ;-)
> 
>       I'll attach my responses to yours in the
> attached doc. I changed it to track by author so
> it'll be easier to spot my comments.
> 
>       I'd like to attend the Tuesday meeting. Please
> let me know when and where.
> 
>         ----- Original Message ----- 
>         From:June Mullins
>         To:antera, cryptofreak dot org
>         Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM
>         Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)!
> 
> 
>         Perry's added some good points - I obviously
> didn't understand the whole
>         story about the portal.  Let's discuss this
> further at the meeting on Tuesday.
> 
>                   June
> 
>         Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote:
> 
> I read through Junes revisions. I inserted my
> comments in the doc.Hopefully I'm misreading it or
> June was sick while she wrote it.P----- Original
> Message -----From: "June Mullins"
> <junemullins, earthlink dot net>To:
> <antera, cryptofreak dot org>Sent: Wednesday, October 17,
> 2001 3:01 PMSubject: Arch doc (finally)!
> My apologies for taking so long - I was babying
> myself with my cold.It's almost all better now.I
> just made a few changes to the arch doc, which I
> hope make it moreclear.  I added back someof Perry's
> words from his original arch doc, because I felt the
> newversion was kind !
> of!
>  too vagueabout what we are actually trying to
> build.  I also added examples insome places for the
> samereason.  Finally, I changed Data Manager to
> Request Manager, becausePersistent Data Manageris
> too confusing close to Data Manager.  If anybody can
> think of abetter name, that's fine too. 
> I'dappreciate comments and amendments to the doc. 
> Even though you guys dida great job ofexplaining the
> architectural changes you made while I was gone, I'm
> sureI could have missed someimportant points.Here
> are some questions we came up with last meeting:- Is
> there a problem with timeouts when we need to!
> r!estore a file fromtape?  Do we block on open,  
> and wait until the entire file is restored?  Do we
> block on read, andwait only until we can satisfy the
>   read (i.e., continue to restore the file in the
> background)?  Jay,would it be hard for you to run
> some   experiments with your current driver code !
> - !
> put in a sleep beforeresponding to reads or opens,
> and   see what happens with CIFS, NFS, or local
> requests?- Can we (should we) take advantage of
> HSM-aware applications?- Do we need dynamically
> expandable storage?  With RAID protection?- Would it
> be reasonable to require the customer to have a tape
> librarywith more than one tape drive?   Two tape
> drives would be useful for autorestore during
> disaster
> recovery.
> - We need to know more about what the different
> management policieswould be.- What do we want to
> build for a prototype?I also want everyone to know
> that I am single-handedly responsible fordriving up
> the price ofTricord stock.  I sold all my stock
> Monday at $1.20.  It is now $1.74.It galls me that I
> didsomething useful for Tricord.Don't forget - we
> have a meeting next Tuesday at the library at
> 1:30.Kevin an!
> d !
> Brian - are you employed yet?        June
>                   Software Architecture-rev2.doc
> Content-Type: application/msword 
>                         Content-Encoding: base64 
>                  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
--
This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.

• Next message: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Previous message: Dan Oister: "Re: Arch doc (finally)!"
• In reply to: Dan Oister: "Re: Arch doc (finally)!"
• Next in thread: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: Dan Oister: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: June Mullins: "Re: meeting"
• Reply: June Mullins: "Re: meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.10.23 - 04.02 MDT