|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
From: Dan Oister (dano, gtme dot cc) Date: 2001.10.22 - 10.23 MDT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 I'm headed for the airport, again. Things are looking pretty good. Sorry for the quiet period. Next week I'm off the road and would love to hook up with the team and "cross-pollenate" Take care! Dan O ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don jessup" <djessup72, yahoo dot com> To: <antera, cryptofreak dot org> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: meeting > Just confirming the meeting is tomorrow at 1:30. > Right? > > don > > --- Dan Oister <dano, gtme dot cc> wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Have a good week. > > > > I'll be in touch. > > > > Dan O > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Perry and Lorae Merritt > > To: antera, cryptofreak dot org > > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:55 AM > > Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! > > > > > > Apparently so. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: June Mullins > > To: antera, cryptofreak dot org > > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:42 AM > > Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! > > > > > > Tuesday's meeting is at 1:30. Does "I'll > > attach" mean you hadn't done it yet, > > because it's not attached to this one? > > > > June > > > > Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote: > > > > So June, since no one else reads this mail > > list should we just start communicating directly? > > ;-) > > > > I'll attach my responses to yours in the > > attached doc. I changed it to track by author so > > it'll be easier to spot my comments. > > > > I'd like to attend the Tuesday meeting. Please > > let me know when and where. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From:June Mullins > > To:antera, cryptofreak dot org > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM > > Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! > > > > > > Perry's added some good points - I obviously > > didn't understand the whole > > story about the portal. Let's discuss this > > further at the meeting on Tuesday. > > > > June > > > > Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote: > > > > I read through Junes revisions. I inserted my > > comments in the doc.Hopefully I'm misreading it or > > June was sick while she wrote it.P----- Original > > Message -----From: "June Mullins" > > <junemullins, earthlink dot net>To: > > <antera, cryptofreak dot org>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, > > 2001 3:01 PMSubject: Arch doc (finally)! > > My apologies for taking so long - I was babying > > myself with my cold.It's almost all better now.I > > just made a few changes to the arch doc, which I > > hope make it moreclear. I added back someof Perry's > > words from his original arch doc, because I felt the > > newversion was kind ! > > of! > > too vagueabout what we are actually trying to > > build. I also added examples insome places for the > > samereason. Finally, I changed Data Manager to > > Request Manager, becausePersistent Data Manageris > > too confusing close to Data Manager. If anybody can > > think of abetter name, that's fine too. > > I'dappreciate comments and amendments to the doc. > > Even though you guys dida great job ofexplaining the > > architectural changes you made while I was gone, I'm > > sureI could have missed someimportant points.Here > > are some questions we came up with last meeting:- Is > > there a problem with timeouts when we need to! > > r!estore a file fromtape? Do we block on open, > > and wait until the entire file is restored? Do we > > block on read, andwait only until we can satisfy the > > read (i.e., continue to restore the file in the > > background)? Jay,would it be hard for you to run > > some experiments with your current driver code ! > > - ! > > put in a sleep beforeresponding to reads or opens, > > and see what happens with CIFS, NFS, or local > > requests?- Can we (should we) take advantage of > > HSM-aware applications?- Do we need dynamically > > expandable storage? With RAID protection?- Would it > > be reasonable to require the customer to have a tape > > librarywith more than one tape drive? Two tape > > drives would be useful for autorestore during > > disaster > > recovery. > > - We need to know more about what the different > > management policieswould be.- What do we want to > > build for a prototype?I also want everyone to know > > that I am single-handedly responsible fordriving up > > the price ofTricord stock. I sold all my stock > > Monday at $1.20. It is now $1.74.It galls me that I > > didsomething useful for Tricord.Don't forget - we > > have a meeting next Tuesday at the library at > > 1:30.Kevin an! > > d ! > > Brian - are you employed yet? June > > Software Architecture-rev2.doc > > Content-Type: application/msword > > Content-Encoding: base64 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com > -- > This is the antera mailing list. To unsubscribe, email > majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'. > Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/. > -- This is the antera mailing list. To unsubscribe, email majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'. Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.10.23 - 04.02 MDT |
