|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
From: June Mullins (junemullins, earthlink dot net) Date: 2001.10.22 - 11.04 MDT
Yup - 1:30 tomorrow Don jessup wrote: > Just confirming the meeting is tomorrow at 1:30. > Right? > > don > > --- Dan Oister <dano, gtme dot cc> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Have a good week. >> >> I'll be in touch. >> >> Dan O >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Perry and Lorae Merritt >> To: antera, cryptofreak dot org >> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:55 AM >> Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! >> >> >> Apparently so. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: June Mullins >> To: antera, cryptofreak dot org >> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:42 AM >> Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! >> >> >> Tuesday's meeting is at 1:30. Does "I'll >> attach" mean you hadn't done it yet, >> because it's not attached to this one? >> >> June >> >> Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote: >> >> So June, since no one else reads this mail >> list should we just start communicating directly? >> ;-) >> >> I'll attach my responses to yours in the >> attached doc. I changed it to track by author so >> it'll be easier to spot my comments. >> >> I'd like to attend the Tuesday meeting. Please >> let me know when and where. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From:June Mullins >> To:antera, cryptofreak dot org >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:26 AM >> Subject: Re: Arch doc (finally)! >> >> >> Perry's added some good points - I obviously >> didn't understand the whole >> story about the portal. Let's discuss this >> further at the meeting on Tuesday. >> >> June >> >> Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote: >> >> I read through Junes revisions. I inserted my >> comments in the doc.Hopefully I'm misreading it or >> June was sick while she wrote it.P----- Original >> Message -----From: "June Mullins" >> <junemullins, earthlink dot net>To: >> <antera, cryptofreak dot org>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, >> 2001 3:01 PMSubject: Arch doc (finally)! >> My apologies for taking so long - I was babying >> myself with my cold.It's almost all better now.I >> just made a few changes to the arch doc, which I >> hope make it moreclear. I added back someof Perry's >> words from his original arch doc, because I felt the >> newversion was kind ! >> of! >> too vagueabout what we are actually trying to >> build. I also added examples insome places for the >> samereason. Finally, I changed Data Manager to >> Request Manager, becausePersistent Data Manageris >> too confusing close to Data Manager. If anybody can >> think of abetter name, that's fine too. >> I'dappreciate comments and amendments to the doc. >> Even though you guys dida great job ofexplaining the >> architectural changes you made while I was gone, I'm >> sureI could have missed someimportant points.Here >> are some questions we came up with last meeting:- Is >> there a problem with timeouts when we need to! >> r!estore a file fromtape? Do we block on open, >> and wait until the entire file is restored? Do we >> block on read, andwait only until we can satisfy the >> read (i.e., continue to restore the file in the >> background)? Jay,would it be hard for you to run >> some experiments with your current driver code ! >> - ! >> put in a sleep beforeresponding to reads or opens, >> and see what happens with CIFS, NFS, or local >> requests?- Can we (should we) take advantage of >> HSM-aware applications?- Do we need dynamically >> expandable storage? With RAID protection?- Would it >> be reasonable to require the customer to have a tape >> librarywith more than one tape drive? Two tape >> drives would be useful for autorestore during >> disaster >> recovery. >> - We need to know more about what the different >> management policieswould be.- What do we want to >> build for a prototype?I also want everyone to know >> that I am single-handedly responsible fordriving up >> the price ofTricord stock. I sold all my stock >> Monday at $1.20. It is now $1.74.It galls me that I >> didsomething useful for Tricord.Don't forget - we >> have a meeting next Tuesday at the library at >> 1:30.Kevin an! >> d ! >> Brian - are you employed yet? June >> Software Architecture-rev2.doc >> Content-Type: application/msword >> Content-Encoding: base64 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com > -- > This is the antera mailing list. To unsubscribe, email > majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'. > Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/. > > -- This is the antera mailing list. To unsubscribe, email majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'. Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.10.23 - 04.02 MDT |
