|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
From: Michael Dwyer (mdwyer, timestreamtech dot com) Date: 2001.03.08 - 23.20 MST
ARGH! Turn reply-to bashing on! > > Uhhhh... Backwards again... > > --- Michael Dwyer <mdwyer, timestreamtech dot com> wrote: > > Oops. Forgive me for the blank message! > > > > Anyway, I see your picture different. I see a control signal as a > > constant sine wave. When you mix the control signal with the data > > signal (using a PLL, but that's not important right now) you would > > get a signal when the signals matched, and a null when they > differed: > > > > 1 2 3 4 Time > > | | | | > > /\ |/\ |/\ |/\ | Control signal > > \/| \/| \/| \/| > > | | | | > > /\ | /\|/\ |/\ | Data signal > > \/|\/ | \/| \/| > > > > 1 0 1 1 Resulting Signal > > The 'tits' are a side effect of the phase reversal (at T1.5 and T2.5) > but I strongly believe that the signal is in the wave, not the tits. > Mind you, seeing tits signals that the next signal is going to be > opposite the prior. So, at T1 you got a 1. At T1.5 you see tits. At > T2, you will get the opposite of 1. At T 2.5, more tits. So at T3, > it is the opposite of 0 == 1. At T3.5, no tits, so it stays a 1. > > (Please forgive me for dubbing them 'tits'...) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ -- This is the mod-chal mailing list. To unsubscribe, email majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body 'unsubscribe mod-chal'. Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.09.26 - 14.03 MDT |
