• Previous message: June Mullins: "Re: Arch doc (again)"
• In reply to: June Mullins: "Re: Arch doc (again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200

Dan and I are going to be at Front Range at 1:30.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: June Mullins 
  To: antera, cryptofreak dot org 
  Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:37 PM
  Subject: Re: Arch doc (again)


  I think it's when Dan and Perry can make it.  So, guys, when is it????

  Brian Kreider wrote:

    I am back from playing Rambo.  Unfortunately, the elk won the battle.  Is there going to be a meeting tomorrow?  If so, where and when.

    Brian
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-antera, cryptofreak dot org [mailto:owner-antera, cryptofreak dot org]On Behalf Of Perry and Lorae Merritt
      Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 4:15 PM
      To: antera, cryptofreak dot org
      Subject: Re: Arch doc (again)


      I read through the doc. We have company so I couldn't spend a lot of time on it. 

      I like the toolkit nomenclature. It's better than ADC.

      I have the same question that's highlighted in the doc. "Is this true - specifically, are there any other file-system peculiarities we have to worry about, or can everything else be handled through the VFS?"

      P


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "June Mullins" <junemullins, earthlink dot net>
      To: <antera, cryptofreak dot org>
      Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 12:40 PM
      Subject: Arch doc (again)


      > Since we're meeting on Tuesday, I thought it was about time I got around to
      > making the updates we talked about last Tuesday.  Please check em out.
      > I didn't do anything about the focus issue.  We talked about the fact 
      > the the
      > document describes the general Antera architecture, but doesn't say much
      > about the archiving appliance we are actually focussing on building.  
      > That's
      > because the architecture is much more general, and is really independent of
      > any particular application.  However, the general focus means we don't say
      > anything about particular tools, such as HSM support code; and we don't
      > really say much about archiving at all.  Is this satisfactory????
      > 
      > I assume we're meeting at 1:30 again.  Does anyone want to change the time?
      > Would it be more convenient if we met earlier or later?
      > 
      > Remember other unresolved issues from last meeting:
      > 
      > - Is there a problem with timeouts when we need to restore a file from 
      > tape?  Do we block on open,
      >   and wait until the entire file is restored?  Do we block on read, and 
      > wait only until we can satisfy the
      >   read?
      > - Can we (should we) take advantage of HSM-aware applications?
      > - Do we need dynamically expandable storage?  With RAID protection?
      > - Would it be reasonable to require the customer to have a tape library 
      > with more than one tape drive?
      >   Two tape drives would be useful for autorestore during disaster recovery.
      > - We need to know more about what the different management policies 
      > would be.
      > - What do we want to build for a prototype?
      > 
      >         June
      > 
      > 




--
This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.

• Previous message: June Mullins: "Re: Arch doc (again)"
• In reply to: June Mullins: "Re: Arch doc (again)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.10.30 - 04.02 MST