cryptofreak.org cryptofreak home projects
contact about
Contact:


projects
News Agenda
Antera Antera
News Commentator
News fcreate
Linux Porting Linux Porting
mod-chal mod-chal
Quake III Quake III
News Zope
Contact: webmaster

From: June Mullins (junemullins, earthlink dot net)
Date: 2001.10.29 - 15.37 MST


I think it's when Dan and Perry can make it.  So, guys, when is it????

Brian Kreider wrote:

> I am back from playing Rambo.  Unfortunately, the elk won the battle.  
> Is there going to be a meeting tomorrow?  If so, where and when.
> 
>  
> 
> Brian
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: owner-antera, cryptofreak dot org 
>     [mailto:owner-antera, cryptofreak dot org]On Behalf Of Perry and Lorae 
>     Merritt
>     Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 4:15 PM
>     To: antera, cryptofreak dot org
>     Subject: Re: Arch doc (again)
>     
>     I read through the doc. We have company so I couldn't spend a lot 
>     of time on it.
>     
>      
>     
>     I like the toolkit nomenclature. It's better than ADC.
>     
>      
>     
>     I have the same question that's highlighted in the doc. "Is this 
>     true - specifically, are there any other file-system peculiarities 
>     we have to worry about, or can everything else be handled through 
>     the VFS?"
>     
>      
>     
>     P
>     
>      
>     
>      
>     
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "June Mullins" <junemullins, earthlink dot net 
>     <mailto:junemullins, earthlink dot net>>
>     
>     To: <antera, cryptofreak dot org <mailto:antera, cryptofreak dot org>>
>     
>     Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 12:40 PM
>     
>     Subject: Arch doc (again)
>     
>     
>      > Since we're meeting on Tuesday, I thought it was about time I 
>     got around to
>      > making the updates we talked about last Tuesday.  Please check 
>     em out.
>      > I didn't do anything about the focus issue.  We talked about 
>     the fact
>      > the the
>      > document describes the general Antera architecture, but doesn't 
>     say much
>      > about the archiving appliance we are actually focussing on 
>     building. 
>      > That's
>      > because the architecture is much more general, and is really 
>     independent of
>      > any particular application.  However, the general focus means 
>     we don't say
>      > anything about particular tools, such as HSM support code; and 
>     we don't
>      > really say much about archiving at all.  Is this satisfactory????
>      >
>      > I assume we're meeting at 1:30 again.  Does anyone want to 
>     change the time?
>      > Would it be more convenient if we met earlier or later?
>      >
>      > Remember other unresolved issues from last meeting:
>      >
>      > - Is there a problem with timeouts when we need to restore a 
>     file from
>      > tape?  Do we block on open,
>      >   and wait until the entire file is restored?  Do we block on 
>     read, and
>      > wait only until we can satisfy the
>      >   read?
>      > - Can we (should we) take advantage of HSM-aware applications?
>      > - Do we need dynamically expandable storage?  With RAID protection?
>      > - Would it be reasonable to require the customer to have a tape 
>     library
>      > with more than one tape drive?
>      >   Two tape drives would be useful for autorestore during 
>     disaster recovery.
>      > - We need to know more about what the different management 
>     policies
>      > would be.
>      > - What do we want to build for a prototype?
>      >
>      >         June
>      >
>      > 
> 



--
This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.10.30 - 04.02 MST