|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
From: Jay Miller (jnmiller, cryptofreak dot org) Date: 2001.03.08 - 22.31 MST
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i - Words by Jay Miller <jnmiller, cryptofreak dot org> [010308 22:16]: > See the dilemma? Any thoughts? Why yes, Jay, I have some thoughts on this matter. I think the second method is correct, and here's why. Notice the control signal that shows up in that same second figure. It is constant, and in time with the phase-changing signal that we have. Here's a picture for our specific problem. Watch how we can add the waves that are directly on top of each other.. 1 2 3 4 | | | | /\ |/\ |/\ |/\ |/\ Control signal \/| \/| \/| \/| | | | | | | | | /\ /\| |/\ /\| |/\ Data signal |\/ \/| |\/ \/| 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 Shit. I just realized I drew the picture in my last mail wrong.. <sigh> BUT ANYWAY, you can see from this that if the data signal remains unchanging, it will continue to combine with the control signal in the same way. SO, I think a tit represents a shift from low to high (or vice versa). NOW WHAT'S UP!??! -- Jay Miller ICQ: 32123421 | YM: ladenedge | http://www.cryptofreak.org PGP: 0xedc9bb8d | 41a6428c 46abd36b 6b259b68 8a28ca4c edc9bb8c -- This is the mod-chal mailing list. To unsubscribe, email majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body 'unsubscribe mod-chal'. Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.09.26 - 14.03 MDT |
