• Next message: Dan Oister: "Tuesday Funding Notes"
• Previous message: Perry and Lorae Merritt: "Another Tricord layoff"
• In reply to: Perry and Lorae Merritt: "Re: Second patent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I look at the second patent and Junes comments.  
  Everything looks great.   I do think it is rather
detailed.  It would be nice to make it as general as
  possible in order to cover other implementations 
  of the same thing.   Next, in the field of study
  you have NAS boxes.  I would reccomend something
   more general that covers other storage devices that
  are not NAS boxes. 


--- Perry and Lorae Merritt <plmerritt, hypermall dot net>
wrote:
> Thanks June. If you haven't read it yet, read this
> one. I accepted most of Junes changes and maybe it
> will keep you from doing the same thing she did.
> 
> I left Application Interface, because its only the
> provisional patent and I didn't want to change
> everything and we can change it later and....But I
> tend to lean towards Aplication Manager.
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: June Mullins 
>   To: antera, cryptofreak dot org 
>   Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:13 PM
>   Subject: Re: Second patent
> 
> 
>   Once again, my comments and suggested changes are
> embedded in the doc.
>   Except for some grammar changes, it looks really
> good.  I'm so glad Perry 
>   gets bored when he doesn't have work to do!
> 
>       June
> 
>   Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote:
> 
>     Ok, here's the second one. It looks similar to
> the first and there is some overlapping information.
> I'll let the lawyer suggest whether we should merge
> these into one patent or not.
> 
>     I'd still like to submit these on Wednesday.
> Guess that means I better get busy on the third one.
> It also means that I'd like your feedback as soon as
> possible.
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     P
> 
>     BTW
>     Had a converstation with garage.com VC on
> Friday. Went really well until he told us we had to
> show lefthand networks our ideas. Dan and I balked
> but agreed to meet with them. If we feel
> uncomfortable, we'll walk.
> 
>     Iggy said the guy in CA is really interested in
> funding us, but doesn't want to do the whole thing
> himself. He asked Iggy to meet him in Palm Springs
> today to discuss it further. The guy is going to try
> and get some of his friends to join him in the
> funding. We might want to try and get him to fund
> just the initial development if he can't get anyone
> to join him.
> 
>     I'm meeting with Sanz tomorrow to get their
> support in influencing StorageTek.
> 
>     Dan had a good converstation with the VP of
> business development for Quantum. He saw a
> presentation and asked for the business plan. he is
> also interested and is a possibility for funding.
> 
>     (Dan can correct as needed)
>           System to provide policy-based management
> of kernel and application software.doc Content-Type:
> application/msword 
>                 Content-Encoding: base64 
>          
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msword name=System to
provide policy-based management of kernel and
application software.doc



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
--
This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.

• Next message: Dan Oister: "Tuesday Funding Notes"
• Previous message: Perry and Lorae Merritt: "Another Tricord layoff"
• In reply to: Perry and Lorae Merritt: "Re: Second patent"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2002.01.16 - 04.02 MST