cryptofreak.org cryptofreak home projects
contact about
Contact:


projects
News Agenda
Antera Antera
News Commentator
News fcreate
Linux Porting Linux Porting
mod-chal mod-chal
Quake III Quake III
News Zope
Contact: webmaster

From: June Mullins (junemullins, earthlink dot net)
Date: 2001.11.02 - 12.03 MST


I thought it would be good to use the passive node for backup because
that way we would be taking advantage of the otherwise idle passive node.
It's just a different way at looking at the role of the passive node.

Perry and Lorae Merritt wrote:

> I think June has it pretty correct, the only difference I see is the concept
> of a seperate backup node. I got the impression they wanted a multi-headed
> solution. It can be active/passive initially. It also has to have an
> integrated backup solution in it. I don't think we have to have a backup
> node per se. If we can pull it off, it would probably be a good feature. We
> just need to make sure we can do backups in the event we don't have a node
> to do them, i.e. one of the heads is gone/dead.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "June Mullins" <junemullins, earthlink dot net>
> To: <antera, cryptofreak dot org>
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:13 AM
> Subject: We need to meet - change in direction!!
> 
> 
>> Hi all,
>>      Perry just called.  Dan spent some time talking to Barry in England,
>> and it turns out that Barry wants ARVM first, not ADML.  That is, I
>> believe, a Supernova-like RAID5 solution with a backup application on
>> the box and with two heads.  Active-passive is OK.
>> 
>>      Can we meet sometime over the weekend or on Monday?  Please
>> let me know ASAP!  Perry and I can make either time.
>> 
>>      Here's a brief outline of some thoughts on how this would work, as
>> I remember them:
>>       - We do our own RAID5.  We add storage by brute-force restriping.
>>       - We do our own snapshot copy.
>>       - We use the passive head for backups.  The active head communicates
>>          snapshot copy associated changes to the passive head, so the
>> passive
>>          head backs up the correct data.
>> 
>>        As Perry points out, this can all work within the existing
>> architecture
>> (i.e., the filter driver and the portal).
>> 
>>            June
>> 
>> --
>> This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
>> majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
>> Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
>> 
> 
> --
> This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
> majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
> Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.
> 
> 



--
This is the antera mailing list.  To unsubscribe, email
majordomo, cryptofreak dot org with message body `unsubscribe antera'.
Or, for more information, visit http://www.cryptofreak.org/.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 2001.11.03 - 01.58 MST